Articles:
|
Notes on negation and contradiction
SUMMARY:
Conflicts are human situations in which we experience the negative force of
an opposition. It depends on the different roles a negation
actually plays in it, whether a conflict is a contradiction or it is not.
Working out these concepts, the article draws some general conclusions
about "contradiction" as dynamic core of a living Totality.
|
|
Cartesian
skepticism and empirical beliefs
SUMMARY:
In
the on-line Dictionary of Philosophy of Mind (‹PoM›), Cartesian skepticism
is defined as follows: Any
of a class of skeptical views against empirical knowledge based on the
claim that claims to empirical knowledge are defeated by the possibility
that we might be deceived insofar as we might be, for example, dreaming, hallucinating,
deceived by demons, or brains in vats . From this standpoint, Pete
Mandik, in the same Dictionary, builds an argument to be used as a
representative for the whole
class of skeptical views having the properties stated above. He intends to
defend Cartesian skepticism, taken under the form of the given
definition, and inquiries into the propositions which constitute the
inference: the argument is not only valid, he concludes, it is also sound.
But If we distinguished the case of our ordinary language from the case of
theoretical or scientific discourse, for instance, would the answer remain
the same ?
|
|
The
problem of scientific abstraction in Marx
SUMMARY:
The logical and epistemological status of Marx's work, in Dobb's Theories,
appears not to be substantially different from that of the other authors,
whose ideas the book explains. Of course, when the motives and the aims of
Marx's work are considered, the contrast between his work and that of the
economists appear to be important and deep. Marx intended to draw up a
synoptic view of the development of the whole system of human society. His
economics was only a part, though a fundamental part, of his all-embracing
conceptions, which concerned the unhappiness of man in mass society not
less than the way it produces goods and services. But he also thought that
any inquiring into the ideas and the culture of a given historical epoch
should be backed by a scientific analysis into the empirical forms of its
determinate existence.
|
|
Dialettica: tre significati ?
SUMMARY:
In the attempt to give a characterization of a complex and mostly
indefinable idea such as ‘dialectic’, one move may consist in stressing its
analytical aspects, i.e. its power to dissolve ‹rigid things› into ‹dynamical
relations›. ‘Dialectic’ reveals ‹reification› (by which
relations are given the form of a thing ) and so doing it discloses the pattern
of connections which lay under the surface of our everyday experience, in
the very place where we can see but unrelated particulars. Now, a problem
arises with this dissolving power metaphor , when we observe it
matches two different models of reasoning at the same time. We say we bring
into relation either when relation stands between two elements, whose
level of generality is for the one equal or higher than that of the other,
either when relation stands between two elements, whose level of generality
is for the one lower than that of the other. Either when, to make it clear,
we connect humanity with animality (i.e. a class taken as one
with another class taken as one) either when we connect humanity
with men (a class taken as one with a class taken as many).
For instance, dialectically discussing of the thought of God, Hegel
brings it into relation with the beauty of fine art and the truth
of philosophy. Marx brings religion into relation with a social sufferance
, i.e. with something which has to do with existence and the determinate
forms of its empirical presence.
|
|
Modelli di
razionalitą non monotonica
(considerazioni su Dobb che espone Marx)
SUMMARY:
In his Theories of value, 1973, when explaining the salient
features of Marx's thought, M. Dobb stresses its building process regarded
as a part of a larger cultural debate and as an intellectual work of an
individual mind, still in search of its way to the categories of the system.
The fundamental concept of exploitation, for instance, is
investigated when it is but an analogy and an assumption,
before its turning into an accurate definition. There are scientific
contexts, in which systems are taught and learned without even mentioning
the earlier moves they were engendered by. But according to what Dobb says
about Marx and the other authors of his Theories, this is not the
case here. The article assumes this point of view and seeks to trace it
back to Marx's idea that object is not a "position" of thought.
|
|
The metaphysical
myth of everyday language as «the immaturity of Tought»
SUMMARY:
The sphere of our everyday life can be regarded or as a chaotic "matter"
to be molded and enlightened by reason or as an organism already bearing a
"form", though still in embryo, to be "brought to
light" by labor of Philosophy. Focusing on the "bringing
to light" metaphor, the article tries to show what an ambiguity
lies concealed in it.
|
|
Su "che cosa č "
SUMMARY:
Despite of its technical appearance the "problem of epistemological
adequacy" ("Church’s thesis" being the most
famous instance of it) meets the major themes of Western Metaphysics. Pursuing
this path and exploring what gap there is between a defined term and the
term which corresponds to it in a language already in use, the article
draws some general implications concerning existence and the intellectual
efforts to get hold of its "inner" meaning.
|
|
Veritą e
ideologia
SUMMARY:
The marxian concept of Ideology is here reviewed and revised on a logical
thinking base: can it survive the challenge without dropping its
distinctive features and loosing its original identity ?
|
|
| Dialegesthai |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|